Labral Tear Injuries

The labrum is a ring of fibrocartilage that lines the shoulder socket, deepening the joint and providing stability to the upper arm bone during movement. A shoulder labral tear can result from a single traumatic work accident, repetitive overhead strain that builds over months of physically demanding work, or a combination of both.  Under Florida workers’ compensation law, the legal standard that applies to a claim may differ depending on which of those mechanisms is at issue, which is part of what makes these claims worth understanding carefully.

Rosenberg & Rosenberg, P.A. may review shoulder labral tear injuries alongside the complete medical record, job duty history, and diagnostic findings to help injured workers understand the options that may be available under Florida law. Our firm has served workers throughout Broward, Miami-Dade, and Palm Beach Counties for around 50 years.

Types of Shoulder Labral Tear Injuries in Workers’ Compensation Claims

The shoulder labrum may tear in several distinct patterns, each associated with different workplace mechanisms.

SLAP tears (Superior Labrum Anterior to Posterior) affect the top of the labrum where the biceps tendon attaches. They are common among workers who perform repeated overhead throwing or pulling motions, and they can also result from a fall onto an outstretched arm or a sudden pull on the shoulder joint. SLAP tears may appear in workers’ compensation claims involving construction, warehousing, and trade jobs. 

Bankart tears affect the front of the labrum and are most commonly associated with shoulder dislocation. A workplace fall or sudden forceful impact that causes the shoulder to dislocate may result in this type of tear. Workers whose jobs involve climbing, working at heights, or operating heavy equipment may be at elevated risk for the acute traumatic events that cause Bankart tears.

Posterior labral tears occur at the back of the labrum and are associated with repetitive compression or impingement from behind the shoulder, as may occur in certain overhead or pushing tasks.

Two Causation Pathways Under Florida Law

The causation standard applicable to labral tear injuries in Florida workers’ compensation depends on whether the tear arose from a single acute workplace event or from repetitive occupational exposure.

For acute traumatic labral tear injuries, such as a tear resulting from a fall, a dislocation during a workplace accident, or a sudden load placed on the shoulder, the standard under Florida Statutes § 440.09(1) generally requires that the injury be established to a reasonable degree of medical certainty based on objective medical findings, and that the workplace event be the major contributing cause, meaning more than 50 percent responsible compared to all other causes combined.

For labral tear injuries allegedly caused by repetitive work or repeated job duties, such as a SLAP tear attributed to years of overhead work, § 440.09 requires both causation and sufficient occupational exposure to be established by clear and convincing evidence. This is a higher evidentiary standard than the one applicable to acute injuries. A treating physician’s opinion that specifically connects the job duties and their frequency to the development of the tear, and that addresses the contribution of any preexisting degenerative changes, is generally a more significant part of the claim under this standard.

Where a claim involves both an acute event and a history of repetitive overhead work, identifying which mechanism is the primary basis for the claim may affect how the medical evidence needs to be developed.

Occupations Where Labral Tear Injuries Are Common in South Florida

Certain occupations involve lifting, overhead activity, patient handling, falls, or repetitive shoulder movements that may be associated with shoulder labral injuries. Whether a particular labral tear is work-related depends on the circumstances and supporting medical and occupational evidence.

Construction Workers

Construction workers, including framers, roofers, and electricians, may regularly perform overhead, lifting, and pulling tasks that place stress on the shoulder. Falls from ladders, scaffolding, or elevated surfaces may also result in traumatic shoulder injuries. When a shoulder dislocation or other acute injury occurs, incident reports, medical records, and documentation of the accident mechanism may be relevant when evaluating a potential labral tear claim.

Healthcare Workers

Nurses, nursing assistants, and other patient-care workers may experience shoulder injuries while transferring or repositioning patients or attempting to stabilize a patient who suddenly loses balance. These activities may involve forceful or unexpected shoulder movements. Medical documentation and descriptions of the worker’s specific duties may help evaluate whether workplace activity potentially contributed to a diagnosed labral tear.

Warehouse and Port Workers

Warehouse, distribution center, and port workers may perform frequent lifting, loading, unloading, pulling, and overhead handling tasks. A labral injury may also follow a fall or another acute workplace event. When repetitive activity is alleged to have contributed to the condition, the frequency, duration, and physical demands of the worker’s duties may be relevant to evaluating causation under applicable Florida workers’ compensation requirements.

Painting, Drywall, Electrical, and HVAC Workers

Painters, drywall installers, electricians, and HVAC workers may spend significant periods performing overhead tasks. Repetitive reaching, lifting, pulling, and working with the arms elevated may place continued stress on the shoulder. Detailed job-duty records, treatment history, physician opinions, and other available evidence may be considered when evaluating whether occupational activity is potentially related to a labral tear.

Labral Tear Injuries

Why Imaging Matters in Labral Tear Claims

This type of shoulder injury presents a specific diagnostic challenge that is relevant to how a claim is evaluated. Standard MRI alone does not always detect labral pathology. The more reliable imaging study for suspected labral pathology is an MR arthrogram, a contrast-enhanced MRI in which dye is injected into the shoulder joint before imaging to better outline the labrum. CT arthrogram is an alternative in some circumstances.

A negative standard MRI does not rule out a labral tear. Where a worker presents with symptoms consistent with labral pathology, including deep shoulder pain, a catching or clicking sensation during arm movement, and instability, but an initial MRI is negative or inconclusive, the absence of an arthrogram study may create a documentation gap that affects how the claim is reviewed. Requesting the appropriate advanced imaging through the authorized treating physician is often an important step in establishing the extent of the injury.

This imaging question also has practical implications for how preexisting degenerative findings are interpreted. Age-related labral fraying, seen on imaging in many workers over 40, may be present alongside an acute traumatic tear. A physician’s opinion that distinguishes between the preexisting degenerative finding and the acute traumatic tear, and addresses which was the major contributing cause of the need for treatment, is generally more useful to a claim than imaging alone without a specific causation opinion.

Preexisting Shoulder Conditions and Labral Tears 

Age-related labral degeneration, prior shoulder injuries, and prior surgeries are common findings in the shoulder MRI of workers over 40. When such findings are present, a coverage question may arise under Florida Statutes § 440.09(1)(b) about whether the workplace event or exposure was more than 50 percent responsible for the injury as compared to all other causes combined.

A preexisting condition does not automatically bar a claim. If the workplace event, when supported by the evidence, aggravated or accelerated an existing labral condition beyond its natural course, a physician may be able to document that work was the major contributing cause of the need for treatment. 

Reporting and Filing Deadlines

Florida Statutes § 440.185 generally requires an injured worker to report a workplace injury to their employer within 30 days. For shoulder injuries that arise from an acute event, the 30-day clock generally runs from the date of the accident. For injuries allegedly related to repetitive exposure, the relevant question under § 440.19 may be when the worker knew or should have known the condition was related to employment.

The general deadline to file a petition for benefits under § 440.19 is two years from the date of the accident or from the date the worker knew or should have known the injury was work-related, subject to statutory exceptions.

Benefit Categories That May Apply

When a compensable shoulder labral condition is accepted under Florida Statutes Chapter 440, benefit categories that may be available include:

  • Medical benefits. Authorized treatment may include diagnostic imaging, physical therapy, corticosteroid injections, and, where medically indicated, arthroscopic surgical repair of the labrum. Treatment must generally be provided through the authorized physician network under the carrier’s plan.
  • Wage replacement benefits. If the injury, when supported by the evidence, results in temporary total or temporary partial disability, wage replacement may be available at approximately two-thirds of the worker’s average weekly wage, subject to the 104-week limit under § 440.15 and applicable exceptions recognized by Florida courts.
  • Permanent impairment benefits. If the worker reaches maximum medical improvement with a remaining impairment, benefits may be calculated under Florida’s impairment rating guidelines.
  • One-time change of physician. Under Florida Statutes § 440.13(2)(f), an injured worker generally has the right to request a one-time change of authorized treating physician, which may be relevant when there are differences in causation opinions or diagnostic approaches between providers.

A Prior Workers’ Compensation Matter Involving a Shoulder Injury

In one workers’ compensation matter handled by Rosenberg & Rosenberg, P.A., a client sustained a shoulder injury during the course of employment and underwent arthroscopic shoulder surgery as part of authorized medical treatment. The workers’ compensation claim addressed medical expenses and lost wages associated with the injury and recovery period. Based on the specific circumstances of that matter, the claim ultimately settled for $150,000.

This prior matter provides a case example of how a work-related shoulder injury may involve surgical treatment, medical expenses, time away from work, and workers’ compensation benefits. The medical findings, circumstances of the workplace injury, available benefits, and potential value of any labral tear claim may differ based on the specific facts and supporting evidence.

Disclaimer: The facts and circumstances of your case may differ from the matter in which this result was achieved. Not all results are provided. The results on this page are not necessarily representative of results obtained by the lawyer. Every case is different, and each client’s case must be evaluated and handled on its own merits.

FAQs about Labral Tear Injuries

Q1. Can labral tear injuries qualify for workers’ compensation in Florida?
They may, depending on whether the medical evidence supports the applicable causation requirements under Florida workers’ compensation law. The evaluation may differ depending on whether the injury followed a specific workplace accident or developed through repetitive occupational activity.

Q2. Can repetitive work activities contribute to a labral tear claim?
Potentially. Repetitive lifting, pulling, pushing, or overhead activity may be relevant to a claim when supported by medical and occupational evidence connecting the work activities to the shoulder condition.

Q3. What if my MRI did not show a labral tear?
A negative standard MRI does not necessarily rule out a labral tear. Depending on the circumstances, a physician may consider additional diagnostic testing, such as an MR arthrogram or CT arthrogram, when evaluating suspected labral pathology.

Q4. Does a preexisting shoulder condition affect a labral tear claim?
It may. When a preexisting shoulder condition is involved, medical evidence may be necessary to evaluate the relationship between the workplace injury or occupational activity and the diagnosed labral tear under applicable Florida workers’ compensation requirements.

Q5. What evidence may be relevant to a labral tear workers’ compensation claim?
Medical records, diagnostic imaging, physician opinions, accident reports, job-duty documentation, treatment history, work restrictions, and evidence concerning repetitive workplace activities may be relevant when evaluating the claim.

Q6. What workers’ compensation benefits may be available for a labral tear?
Depending on eligibility and the circumstances, benefits may include authorized medical treatment and certain wage-related or disability benefits. The benefits that may be available depend on medical findings, work restrictions, and other claim-specific factors.How Rosenberg & Rosenberg, P.A. Reviews These Claims

Rosenberg & Rosenberg, P.A. provides guidance on workers’ compensation claims involving shoulder labral tear injuries by reviewing medical records, imaging findings, job-duty documentation, and benefit history to help evaluate the options that may be available under Florida law. For accepted cases, attorney’s fees generally depend on obtaining a recovery, subject to the written fee agreement. Court costs and case expenses may apply. Our firm is available 24/7 and offers free initial consultations. 

Contact an attorney at Rosenberg & Rosenberg, P.A. to learn more about the workers’ compensation options that may be available for your labral tear claim.

This page is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Viewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship with Rosenberg & Rosenberg, P.A. Past results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome in any future case.

Client Reviews
Elizabeth T profile picture
Elizabeth T
2 weeks ago
Attorney Frank Anglone, was very helpful and understanding, he fought for what I deserve and I highly recommend and I would do all over again if I could
David Savery profile picture
David Savery
3 weeks ago
Michelle and Ivan.
The best Paralegal here.
Wonderful professional service.
Mr. Price did a good job on my mother case.
Thank you Ms. Thalerand
Jeannette Castro profile picture
Jeannette Castro
3 weeks ago
We are extremely satisfied with James Price and his team. From start to finish, James was professional, knowledgeable, and compassionate. He and his team answered all our calls and made sure everything was kept in order. They worked very hard on our case and made us feel that we mattered. I would gladly recommend James Price and the Rosenberg firm to anyone needing an attorney who truly cares.
Mackendy St profile picture
Mackendy St
3 weeks ago
Attorney James Price is an excellent attorney. I am very satisfied with the resolution of my case. My name is St. Hilaire Mackendy.
Pamela Belfi profile picture
Pamela Belfi
3 months ago
They are a great group of people... always patient and kind... My attorney Peter Andresky handled my case very professionally. I would recommend him very highly..
Eric D profile picture
Eric D
5 months ago
I highly recommend the law firm of Rosenberg & Rosenberg! Both Paralegal Michelle Helm and Attorney Peter Andresky were fantastic in handling both my workers' comp cases. Their communication was top-notch—they kept me informed every step of the way and made me feel confident throughout the process. Thank you for making a challenging situation so much easier.
YawdBwoii A.T. profile picture
YawdBwoii A.T.
8 months ago
Man where do I start Frank Angione is an Amazing down to earth attorney who’s excellent in what he does which is win your legal case. For this to be my first ever case he definitely made it a breeze, I hardly had to ask questions because everything was so
thoroughly explained. If I could ever recommend anyone as your defense I would Definitely recommend 10/10 Frank Angione.
Darren profile picture
Darren
8 months ago
I had a great experience working with David Krohn. He was very helpful, patient, and easy to talk to. He always kept me updated and made sure I understood what was happening with my case.

I really appreciate how hard he worked and how much he cared about getting a good outcome for me. That meant a lot.

I would definitely recommend David to anyone who needs a lawyer. He’s reliable, honest, and truly looks out for his clients.
Lauren Miller profile picture
Lauren Miller
11 months ago
I had an amazing experience working with David Krohn. From the very beginning, he was honest, attentive, and highly knowledgeable. He kept me informed every step of the way, explained everything clearly, and always made me feel supported and confident throughout the entire process.

David worked hard on my case and truly went above and beyond to make sure I received the best possible outcome. His professionalism, compassion, and dedication really stand out. I’m extremely grateful for everything he did for me.

If you’re looking for a lawyer who genuinely cares and fights for you, I highly recommend David Krohn. He’s the one you want on your side.
Our Location
Rosenberg & Rosenberg, P.A.
Contact Our Firm